Re: Will Open Source be forced to go Proprietary
| От | Bruce Momjian |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Will Open Source be forced to go Proprietary |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200401100457.i0A4veZ06082@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Will Open Source be forced to go Proprietary ("Chris Travers" <chris@travelamericas.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Chris Travers wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
> > Yes I did see that. Actually from what I know of the GPL, this could very
> > well be the case.
> >
> The GPL specifically allows non-Free/Open Source components to talk to GPL'd
> applications via pipes and sockets. I am assuming here that network sockets
> are included, so there is NO copyright reason that, were the protocol
> reverse engineered that a third-party mysql driver couldn't be written. Of
> course, you could NOT use the MySQL source to do it.
But the MySQL description says:
http://www.mysql.com/products/opensource-license.html
Under the Open Source License, you must release the complete source code
for the application that is built on MySQL.
What does that mean, "built on MySQL". I think that means "depends" on
MySQL. At least I have heard that description:
http://www.edwardbear.org/serendipity/archives/1193_My_Beef_with_MySQLs_License.html
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: