Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian writes:
> > > Peter indicated it was not valid docbook and wanted only the
> > > relivant parts, but it looked OK to me. Peter?
> >
> > That's what I said, that's what I meant.
>
> Well, I can't see anything wrong with the SGML, and you are not
> telling me what is wrong, so I guess I will just apply it and find
> out where the SGML build fails.
This patch is already taken care of.