Re: fork/exec patch
| От | Bruce Momjian |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: fork/exec patch |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200312170235.hBH2ZNJ07561@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: fork/exec patch (Claudio Natoli <claudio.natoli@memetrics.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-patches |
Claudio Natoli wrote:
>
> Resubmission, incorporating Neil Conway's comments and some minor
> corrections.
I am now thinking we have to remove pgsql/data/pgsql_tmp
unconditionally:
***************
*** 1217,1224 ****
{
while ((db_de = readdir(db_dir)) != NULL)
{
! if (strcmp(db_de->d_name, ".") == 0 ||
! strcmp(db_de->d_name, "..") == 0)
continue;
snprintf(temp_path, sizeof(temp_path),
--- 1212,1223 ----
{
while ((db_de = readdir(db_dir)) != NULL)
{
! if (strcmp(db_de->d_name, ".") == 0
! #ifndef EXEC_BACKEND
! /* no PG_TEMP_FILES_DIR in DataDir in non EXEC_BACKEND case */
! || strcmp(db_de->d_name, "..") == 0
! #endif
! )
continue;
The reason is that if they stop a postmaster that is fork/exec, install
a non-exec postmaster, and restart, we should still clear out that
directory. I guess what i am saying is that I don't want to tie the
directory format to the exec() case of the binary.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: