Re: fork/exec patch
| От | Bruce Momjian | 
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: fork/exec patch | 
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200312170235.hBH2ZNJ07561@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст | 
| Ответ на | Re: fork/exec patch (Claudio Natoli <claudio.natoli@memetrics.com>) | 
| Список | pgsql-patches | 
Claudio Natoli wrote:
>
> Resubmission, incorporating Neil Conway's comments and some minor
> corrections.
I am now thinking we have to remove pgsql/data/pgsql_tmp
unconditionally:
    ***************
    *** 1217,1224 ****
          {
              while ((db_de = readdir(db_dir)) != NULL)
              {
    !             if (strcmp(db_de->d_name, ".") == 0 ||
    !                 strcmp(db_de->d_name, "..") == 0)
                      continue;
                  snprintf(temp_path, sizeof(temp_path),
    --- 1212,1223 ----
          {
              while ((db_de = readdir(db_dir)) != NULL)
              {
    !             if (strcmp(db_de->d_name, ".") == 0
    ! #ifndef EXEC_BACKEND
    !             /* no PG_TEMP_FILES_DIR in DataDir in non EXEC_BACKEND case */
    !                 || strcmp(db_de->d_name, "..") == 0
    ! #endif
    !             )
                      continue;
The reason is that if they stop a postmaster that is fork/exec, install
a non-exec postmaster, and restart, we should still clear out that
directory.  I guess what i am saying is that I don't want to tie the
directory format to the exec() case of the binary.
--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
		
	В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: