On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Robert,
>
> > 3b) Move any remaining bits of techdocs into a new architecture (current is
> > crufty php manually maintained) I personally think it should be openacs, but
> > even homebrew php done correctly would be a major upgrade.
>
> The problem is that OpenACS is an architecture, it's *not* a content
> manager. Honestly, my first thought when Justin "handed over" techdocs
> to me (not that I;ve done anything with it) was to contact the OpenACS
> folks and see if there was a full-service CMS built on OpenACS.
> There's not.
Not that I'm advocating one solution over another, but doesn't OACS 5.x
have a CMS?
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664