Re: pljava revisited

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > libpq++ got heaved overboard largely
> > because the autoconf burden for it was too high,
> 
> That's news to me.  Certainly the overhead doesn't grow smaller by 
> splitting stuff up in smaller pieces.

Yea, now there is no configure for libpq++ at all, so you have to muck
around with it to get it to compile.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073