Re: Anyone working on pg_dump dependency ordering?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Stephan Szabo
Тема Re: Anyone working on pg_dump dependency ordering?
Дата
Msg-id 20031122081814.E14063@megazone.bigpanda.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Anyone working on pg_dump dependency ordering?  (Andreas Pflug <pgadmin@pse-consulting.de>)
Ответы Re: Anyone working on pg_dump dependency ordering?
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sat, 22 Nov 2003, Andreas Pflug wrote:

> Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > There are two levels (sort of) of dependency.  The first is that whole
> > classes of objects can be dependent on whole other classes.  eg.
> > databases depend on users, or ALL FK's can be dumped after ALL tables,
> > etc..  It would make the dump more readable if you dumped those
> > definite dependencies in that order, rather than shuffling everything up.
> >
> I agree that dumping should be done class-wise (Tables, Functions,
> Views) whenever possible, but I don't agree on FKs dumped separately
> from the table. IMHO indexes and constraints belong to the table, and
> modifying the dump will be hard if a table's code is scattered all around.

You're going to potentially have the constraints scattered in any case due
to circular dependency chains. I'd think that having all the constraints
in one place would be easier than trying to go through the list of tables
that might be in a circular chain in order to find the constraints.


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andreas Pflug
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Anyone working on pg_dump dependency ordering?
Следующее
От: "Nigel J. Andrews"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Commercial binary support?