Re: Release cycle length
От | Kevin Brown |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Release cycle length |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20031118032620.GK6073@filer обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Release cycle length ("Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew@zeut.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Matthew T. O'Connor wrote: > I agree with Peter's other comment, that the longer the development > cycle, the longer the beta / bug shakeout period, perhaps a shorter dev > cycle would yield a shorter beta period, but perhaps it would also > result in a less solid release. Perhaps. Perhaps not. The fewer the changes, the less complexity you have to manage. But it would certainly result in a smaller set of feature changes per release. Some people might regard that as a good thing. The advantage to doing more frequent releases is that new features end up with more real-world testing within a given block of time, on average, because a lot more people pick up the releases than the CVS snapshots or even release candidates.. -- Kevin Brown kevin@sysexperts.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: