Re: SIGPIPE handling

On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 12:56:10PM +0100, Manfred Spraul wrote:
> Hi,
>
> attached is an update of my automatic sigaction patch: I've moved the
> actual sigaction calls into pqsignal.c and added a helper function
> (pgsignalinquire(signo)). I couldn't remove the include <signal.h> from
> fe-connect.c: it's required for the SIGPIPE definition.
> Additionally I've added a -a flag for pgbench that sets the signal
> handler before calling PQconnectdb.

Is there a reason we don't make use of the MSG_NOSIGNAL flag to
send()?  Or is the problem in case of SSL?


Kurt