Jan Wieck wrote:
> Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD wrote:
>
> >> > One problem with O_SYNC would be, that the OS does not group writes any
> >> > more. So the code would need to eighter do it's own sorting and grouping
> >> > (256k) or use aio, or you won't be able to get the maximum out of the disks.
> >>
> >> Or just run multiple writer processes, which I believe is Oracle's
> >> solution.
> >
> > That does not help, since for O_SYNC the OS'es (those I know) do not group those
> > writes together. Oracle allows more than one writer to busy more than one disk(subsystem) and circumvent other per
processlimitations (mainly on platforms without AIO).
>
> Yes, I think the best way would be to let the background process write a
> bunch of pages, then fsync() the files written to. If one tends to have
> many dirty buffers to the same file, this will group them together and
> the OS can optimize that. If one really has completely random access,
> then there is nothing to group.
Agreed. This might force enough stuff out to disk the checkpoint/sync()
would be OK. Jan, have you tested this?
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073