Rich,
> That was my thought - I was fairly sure I fixed it though..... Do, really
> need to be specific in terms of type in terms of int, or can I put numeric,
INT and numeric are fairly different, and I believe that SRF return types are
very fussy about data types; I wouldn't be surprised if you got an error for
using an INT4 in place of an INT8.
> and for varchar(30) I can just put varchar in my type definition.
That I don't think will be a problem; varchar limits are indifferently
supported anyway.
--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco