Re: Almost relational PostgreSQL (was: one-to-one)
| От | Antonios Christofides |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Almost relational PostgreSQL (was: one-to-one) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20031104185223.GB5115@localhost обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Almost relational PostgreSQL (was: one-to-one) (Michael Glaesmann <grzm@myrealbox.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Almost relational PostgreSQL (was: one-to-one)
|
| Список | pgsql-novice |
Josh Berkus wrote:
> My personal limit of denormalization stops at a few NULL columns and using
> cache tables to hold copies of views which are too slow.
Here's a trivial design problem involving NULLs (the only conscious
violation of Pascal I did in that database): I have a "gaddresses" table
that holds addresses of geographical points (such as your house):
id (PK and FK: specifies the geographical point of which we are giving the address)
country (FK)
state (FK, nullable: specifies the state of the US if the country is US)
address (the rest of the address)
Pascal says: use NULL only for missing, not for inapplicable. Here the
state is inapplicable unless the country is US.
What should I do instead? Create another table, "gstates"?
id (PK and FK to gaddresses)
state (FK)
Is this overkill?
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: