Re: Same conditions, different planning?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Shridhar Daithankar
Тема Re: Same conditions, different planning?
Дата
Msg-id 200310221703.32589.shridhar_daithankar@myrealbox.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Same conditions, different planning?  (Pedro Alves <pmalves@think.pt>)
Ответы Re: Same conditions, different planning?
Список pgsql-general
On Wednesday 22 October 2003 16:25, Pedro Alves wrote:

> Machine 1:
>
>     explain select count(*) from requisicaoanalise where isactive = 1 AND
> (ra_servico = 4) AND (ra_datacolh <= '2003-10-22'::date);
>                                           QUERY PLAN
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>-------------------- Aggregate  (cost=948.45..948.45 rows=1 width=0)
>    ->  Index Scan using ra_isactive on requisicaoanalise
> (cost=0.00..947.07 rows=550 width=0)
>          Index Cond: (isactive = 1)
>          Filter: ((ra_servico = 4) AND (ra_datacolh <= '2003-10-22'::date))
> (4 rows)

Could you please run explain analyze rather than just explain for all the
things you posted earlier?

And are there any tuning parameters different on these two machines? RAM size
of HDD setup etc?

Are these two machine absolutely same from hardware and postgresql tuning
point of view?

 Shridhar


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Shridhar Daithankar
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Postgreqsl & Package
Следующее
От: "Birahim FALL"
Дата:
Сообщение: RE : Postgreqsl & Package