Re: Tuning for mid-size server
| От | Andrew Sullivan |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Tuning for mid-size server |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20031021174852.GG11421@libertyrms.info обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Tuning for mid-size server (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Tuning for mid-size server
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 10:12:15AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
>
> So what is the ceiling on 32-bit processors for RAM? Most of the 64-bit
> vendors are pushing Athalon64 and G5 as "breaking the 4GB barrier", and even
> I can do the math on 2^32. All these 64-bit vendors, then, are talking
> about the limit on ram *per application* and not per machine?
Or per same-time access. Remember that, back in the old days on the
pre-386s, accessing the extended or expanded memory (anyone remember
which was which?) involved some fairly serious work, and not
everything was seamless. I expect something similar is at work here.
Not that I've had a reason to play with 4G ix86 machines, anyway.
A
--
----
Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
Afilias Canada Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew@libertyrms.info> M2P 2A8
+1 416 646 3304 x110
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: