Re: So, are we going to bump catversion for beta5, or not?
| От | Bruce Momjian |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: So, are we going to bump catversion for beta5, or not? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200310210316.h9L3GET10407@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: So, are we going to bump catversion for beta5, or not? (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: So, are we going to bump catversion for beta5, or not?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Tom Lane writes: > > > I'm inclined to do it --- I don't get the sense that too many people > > have loaded large databases into 7.4 beta installations --- but if > > anyone wants to object now is the time. > > Oops, I already did it. But if someone objects, it's an easy change back. I guess my question would be how many people are using information schemas vs. have loaded databases they don't want to reload. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: