Re: Still a few flaws in configure's default CFLAGS selection

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > Also, I thought Peter advocated adding -g a few releases back.  I didn't
> > agree, but I lost the vote, so I thought it was done.  Were we
> > supresssing -g in older releases?  Peter?
> 
> I don't recall any such vote.  Had we done that, we'd have removed
> --enable-debug, I'd think.

The vote was whether -g should be used for a default compile.  Of course
--enable-debug would continue using -g.  Maybe we kept --enable-debug
for backward compatibility or to force -g if you modified CFLAGS?

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073