Re: Cygwin? or paid version from SRA?

On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 09:14:09AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> I think SRA's version has better performance because it is a native
> Windows version, rather than using Cygwin, and it does threading, rather
> than CreateProcess() to start each database session.

I asked SRA a month ago or so if they sold outside Japan, and was told
that "they were not ready yet".  Are they getting ready?

--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"La victoria es para quien se atreve a estar solo"