Re: [GENERAL] Need concrete "Why Postgres not MySQL"
| От | Richard Huxton |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [GENERAL] Need concrete "Why Postgres not MySQL" |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200308220929.32459.dev@archonet.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] Need concrete "Why Postgres not MySQL" ("Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>) |
| Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Friday 22 August 2003 07:40, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > > Can someone explain me why is it usefull if the table created in > > transaction disapears on rollback? > > Because then you can write big scripts like we do at work to install a new > feature in the live database. Such a script might create two new tables, > add columns to existing tables, drop and recreate some foreign keys, etc. > What you do is to test it you go 'begin;' and then execute the script. If > it all worked, commit, else rollback and fix the script. Repeat until you > get it right. Exactly - I'm currently finalising a schema in conjunction with a client who's working with some telecoms control equipment. Being able to modify tables and copy-forward the data inside a transaction is very useful. -- Richard Huxton Archonet Ltd
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: