On Sunday 17 August 2003 16:39, Alexander M. Pravking wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 11:32:58AM +0100, Richard Huxton wrote:
> > Boiling the problem down, I've looked at a clause of the form:
> > a OR (b AND c)
> > which PG converts to:
> > (a OR b) AND (a OR c)
> > Is it an artefact of displaying the EXPLAIN, or is it actually processed
> > that way? You could see how testing "a" twice could be expensive in some
> > situations.
>
> Looks like it actually works this way.
> I had the same problem several weeks ago on 7.3.3 with 4 such OR's.
> The final filter became monsterous, and the query was very slow.
>
> I've simply rewritten the query using UNION, and it became much faster.
Doesn't seem to matter much in this case, although I tried it as a UNION just
to check the results were the same.
Thanks Alexander
-- Richard Huxton Archonet Ltd