On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> > On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Jan is right that we need Win32 maintainers. I want to set up a few
> > > things to grow the group, just like Jan did when he added foreign keys:
> > >
> > > o mailing list
> >
> > pgsql-hackers-win32?
>
> Good.
Done ... I put you as owner of it, but its also listed when I go through
moderated postings ...
> > did we do this for foreign keys? I thought we'd always avoided doing that
> > ...
>
> Right. I don't think we did it for foreign keys, but I think we will
> need it so multiple people can work and submit patches. I could just
> keep a separate Win32 tree here and publish the diffs against current
> CVS, if that is better. I can put it up on ftp, so, yea, we don't need
> it, and it keeps us honest about tracking win32. What it doesn't do is
> to allow folks to get cvs changes to a tree they have already modified.
I have no problems with us creating a branch, and it would make it easy
for anyone to pull things down ... its also keeps all the histories
available centrally ...
Can I suggest a branch at v7.3, so that those working on the win32 have a
'stable branch' to base it off of, and then we can pull things up in v7.4
and -HEAD as they become available?