Re: Package naming conventions

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jean-Michel POURE
Тема Re: Package naming conventions
Дата
Msg-id 200308092255.37308.jm@poure.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Package naming conventions  (Jean-Michel POURE <jm.poure@freesurf.fr>)
Список pgadmin-hackers
On Saturday 09 August 2003 21:21, Jean-Michel POURE wrote:
> ANYWAY: I am rebuilding betas with pgadmin3-0.9.0-1.rpm and will upload
> them during the night. It will take me some time because I have to rebuild
> wxWindows as well. I missed the information to upgrade to 20030722...

Dear friends,

Raphaël wrote me that the required wxWindows version was 20030707, this is OK
for me. To sum up the RPM thing which differs slightlly from Debian:

1) CVS snapshots are numbered:
pgadmin3-{version}-cvs{date}.rpm
pgadmin3-0.9.0-cvs20030809.rpm

2) FTP uploads are numbered:
pgadmin3-{version}-{build}.rpm
pgadmin3-0.9.0-1.rpm

Build should be 1, 2, 3, etc...
When you release a new {version}, the {build} goes back to 1.

Agreed? On your reply, I will rebuild the packages.
Cheers, Jean-Michel


В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Dave Page"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Package naming conventions
Следующее
От: "Dave Page"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Package naming conventions