Re: IN clauses via setObject(Collection) [Was: Re: Prepare

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Paul Thomas
Тема
Re: IN clauses via setObject(Collection) [Was: Re: Prepare
Дата
Msg-id
20030721192443.A4376@bacon
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Re: IN clauses via setObject(Collection) [Was: Re: Prepare Darin Ohashi <DOhashi@maplesoft.com>
Re: IN clauses via setObject(Collection) [Was: Re: Prepare Paul Thomas <paul@tmsl.demon.co.uk>
Re: IN clauses via setObject(Collection) [Was: Re: Prepare Dmitry Tkach <dmitry@openratings.com>

On 21/07/2003 17:38 Darin Ohashi wrote:
> 
> At this point I think I need to re-ask my original question.  Is the
> ability to
> pass a set throught a ? in a JDBC PreparedStatement something that should
> be
> do-able at all, regardless of if you can find an inoffensive way through
> the
> JDBC interface?

It certainly should _not_ be doable using setObject(). It's clear to me 
(look at the first sentance in the javadoc for setObject(int, Object)) 
that it must treat Object as a single object and produce a single value 
which is matched against its paramter marker.
> 
> I believe that a JBDC PreparedStatement is meant to be just a front end
> for an
> SQL PREPARE statement.  If it is not valid to send a set in an SQL
> PREPARE
> statement (which I have not yet been given a definative answer for)
> should there
> be away to pass it through a JDBC PreparedStatement?  What happens when
> you want
> JDBC PreparedStatements to be PREPARE'd statements?  Will this ability be
> dropped at that time or will some messy hack be defined to continue to
> support
> this behaviour?

My understanding is that currently you need to tell the statement to use 
server-side prepares otherwise the driver executes it as a non-prepared 
statement, in which case the back-end is un-troubled by exploitation of 
this bug. If server-side prepares are used, I would expect (haven't tried 
it) that, based on the documentation of the EXECUTE statement, an error 
would be raised because of the mismatch in the number of arguments. 
Somehow, I don't think you'll persuade the core developers to bastardize 
the back-end to make it work with a bastardized, non-complient botch in 
the JDBC driver.

-- 
Paul Thomas
+------------------------------+---------------------------------------------+
| Thomas Micro Systems Limited | Software Solutions for the Smaller 
Business |
| Computer Consultants         | 
http://www.thomas-micro-systems-ltd.co.uk   |
+------------------------------+---------------------------------------------+
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления
От: scott.marlowe
Дата:
От: David Wall
Дата:
FAQ