Postgres Professional
en

Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003...

От: Bruce Momjian
Тема: Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003...
Дата: ,
Msg-id: 200307201921.h6KJL6a10673@candle.pha.pa.us
(см: обсуждение, исходный текст)
Ответ на: Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003...  (Michael Pohl)
Список: pgsql-performance

Скрыть дерево обсуждения

Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003...  (Sean Chittenden, )
 Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003...  (Rod Taylor, )
  Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003...  (Sean Chittenden, )
 Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003...  ("scott.marlowe", )
  Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003...  (Brian Hirt, )
   Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003...  (Sean Chittenden, )
    Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003...  (Matthew Hixson, )
  Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003...  (Sean Chittenden, )
   Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003...  (Tom Lane, )
    Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003...  (Sean Chittenden, )
 Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003...  ("Michael Mattox", )
  Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003...  (Sean Chittenden, )
   Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003...  (Martin Foster, )
   Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003...  (Bruce Momjian, )
 Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003...  (Ron, )
 Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003...  (Tom Lane, )
  Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003...  (Sean Chittenden, )
   Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003...  (Rod Taylor, )
   Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003...  (Manfred Koizar, )
    Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003...  (Sean Chittenden, )
     Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003...  (Manfred Koizar, )
      Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003...  (Sean Chittenden, )
       Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003...  (Tom Lane, )
        Index correlation (was: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003... )  (Manfred Koizar, )
     Use of multipart index with "IN"  (Rob Messer, )
      Re: Use of multipart index with "IN"  (Tom Lane, )
 Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003...  (Josh Berkus, )
  Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003...  (Tom Lane, )
  Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003...  (Tom Lane, )
  Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003...  (Tom Lane, )
  Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003...  (Sean Chittenden, )
   Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003...  (Josh Berkus, )
    Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003...  (Sean Chittenden, )
     Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003...  (Josh Berkus, )
   Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003...  ("Matthew Nuzum", )
    Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003...  (Michael Pohl, )
     Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003...  (Martin Foster, )
     Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003...  (Bruce Momjian, )
    Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003...  (Chris Travers, )
     Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003...  ("Jim C. Nasby", )
   Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003...  (Andrew Sullivan, )
    Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003...  ("Matthew Nuzum", )
     Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003...  ("Michael Mattox", )
     Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003...  (Tom Lane, )
      Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003...  (Kaarel, )
       Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003...  ("scott.marlowe", )
        Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003...  (Martin Foster, )
  Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003...  ("Matthew Nuzum", ) 
Michael Pohl wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Jul 2003, Matthew Nuzum wrote:
>
> > At the very least, if there is good documentation for these parameters,
> > maybe the conf file should provide a link to this info.
>
> I believe that is what Josh is proposing:
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2003-07/msg00102.php
>
> > [Apache httpd] uses a three phase (if not more) documentation level.
> > The .conf file contains detailed instructions in an easy to read and
> > not-to-jargon-ish structure.  The docs provide detailed tutorials and
> > papers that expand on configuration params in an easy to read format.
> > Both of these refer to the thorough reference manual that breaks each
> > possible option down into it's nitty gritty details so that a user can
> > get more information if they so desire.
>
> I agree that Apache's approach is primo.  Often the .conf comments are
> enough to jog my memory about a directive I haven't used for a while.  Or
> the comments are enough to let me know I don't need a directive, or that I
> need to go to the manual and read more.  I appreciate that.

Isn't that what we have now --- isn't postgresql.conf clear enough to
jog people's memory.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
                 |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

В списке pgsql-performance по дате сообщения:

Предыдущее:
От: "Jeremy M. Guthrie"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Poor delete performance AFTER vacuum analyze
Следующее:
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] About the default performance