Re: Scheduled back up (fwd)
| От | nolan@celery.tssi.com |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Scheduled back up (fwd) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20030718164028.11811.qmail@celery.tssi.com обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Scheduled back up (fwd) (Doug McNaught <doug@mcnaught.org>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
> > The existing protocols (pg_dump, etc) are largely geared towards > > DBA-level backups, thus they tend to depend upon backend database > > access and validation schemes, ie, through .pgpass or pg_hba.conf, > > as opposed to frontend tools and user-level privilege grants. > > What's wrong with \copy in psql? \copy is fairly limited, especially when compared with the import/export options in something like Access. This is one of those situation where the tools that Access provides runs circles around the tools that psql provides. Also, what about users who don't have psql access? More importantly, backups are a back end task, data import/export is more of a front end task. If we want to appeal to a wider user base, we have to consider user tool needs. -- Mike Nolan
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: