Re: index / sequential scan problem
От | Paul Thomas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: index / sequential scan problem |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20030717133445.A27991@bacon обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: index / sequential scan problem (Fabian Kreitner <fabian.kreitner@ainea-ag.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: index / sequential scan problem
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On 17/07/2003 12:13 Fabian Kreitner wrote: > That is what I read too and is why Im confused that the index is indeed > executing faster. Can this be a problem with the hardware and/or > postgress installation? It's more likely that the OS has most of the data cached after the first query and so doesn't need to re-read that data from disk when you retry the query with seq scan disabled. Try something like this: set enable_seqscan to true; explain analyze ...... set enable_seqscan to false; explain analyze ...... set enable_seqscan to true; explain analyze ...... I expect you will find that the third query is also a lot faster that the first query. HTH -- Paul Thomas +------------------------------+---------------------------------------------+ | Thomas Micro Systems Limited | Software Solutions for the Smaller Business | | Computer Consultants | http://www.thomas-micro-systems-ltd.co.uk | +------------------------------+---------------------------------------------+
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: