Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003...
| От | Andrew Sullivan |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003... |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20030707092252.GB10293@libertyrms.info обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003... (Sean Chittenden <sean@chittenden.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003...
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 02:12:56PM -0700, Sean Chittenden wrote:
> The SGML docs aren't in the DBA's face and are way out of the way for
> DBAs rolling out a new system or who are tuning the system. SGML ==
> Developer, conf == DBA.
I could not disagree more. I'd say more like, if the dba won't read
the manual, get yourself a real dba. Sorry, but so-called
professionals who won't learn their tools have no home in my shop.
Recently, someone pointed out to me that there _was_ a deficiency
in the docs -- one I thought was not there. And in that case, I was
more than willing to be chastised. But claiming that inadequate
comments in the config file are the only things dbas will lok at,
well, frankly, I'm offended.
A
--
----
Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew@libertyrms.info> M2P 2A8
+1 416 646 3304 x110
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: