Re: How many fields in a table are too many
| От | PeterKorman |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: How many fields in a table are too many |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20030629161148.GC11500@eigenvision.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: How many fields in a table are too many ("Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 01:19:09PM +0530, Shridhar Daithankar wrote: > On 26 Jun 2003 at 3:44, btober@seaworthysys.com wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 03:17:12AM -0400, btober@seaworthysys.com > > > wrote: > > >> > I have a table with 13 fields. Is that > > >> > too many fields for one table. > > >> > Mark > > >> Thirteen? No way. I've got you beat with 21: > > > Pfft! Is *that* all? I've got a table with 116 fields. > > I *knew* a number of these responses would be forthcoming... :) > > I remember somebody posting a database schema with 500 fields. > > Don't worry as long as it works. When you have problems, post it on > performance. First advice you would get is to normalize it..:-) > > Bye > Shridhar Do normal form classifications go into negative numbers?
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: