Re: ECPG thread success (kind of) on Linux

On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 11:58 am, AgentM wrote:
> According to POSIX 1003.1c-1995, no such mutex-altering function exists.

Thanks for the info - useful to know.

> lock the mutex- potentially again). Either that or the recursive locks
> can be eliminated.

Avoiding recursive locks is my preference - the only two I have found ought to
be easy to avoid.

> Just for the record, OS X, Solaris 5.8, FreeBSD 4.8, and LinuxThreads
> support the UNIX98 version, so perhaps this isn't so important after
> all.

Add Tru64 (aka OSF1, aka DEC Unix) to that list. Just checked it.

Regards, Philip.