Re: A bit OT- RE: [PERFORM] Re-ordering .CONF params ... questions for this list

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Josh Berkus
Тема Re: A bit OT- RE: [PERFORM] Re-ordering .CONF params ... questions for this list
Дата
Msg-id 200306160928.07521.josh@agliodbs.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на A bit OT- RE: [PERFORM] Re-ordering .CONF params ... questions for this list  ("Nick Fankhauser" <nickf@ontko.com>)
Список pgsql-advocacy
Nick,

> I agree... but are we the folks that the conf file needs to be made more
> intuitive for?
>
> If the intent is to make it easier for experienced folks like ourselves who
> are working with large or unusual databases to deal with PostgreSQL, then
> certainly the resource usage and tuning settings should go to the top.
> We'll set the other params once & never touch them again.
>
> On the other hand, I suspect that the majority of postgresql users play
> with the other params a bit during install to get their systems working and
> never touch the resource usage or tuning params ever. (And this is as it
> should be, given that the defaults are reasonable for most systems.)

This is a good argument.  Though if you pursue it, surely you're advocating a
GUI tool for PostgreSQL.conf, not that that's a bad idea ...

How do other people feel about this?   What options in PostgreSQL.conf do you
tweak most frequently?

--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jean-Michel POURE
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PostgreSQL presentation at LSM
Следующее
От: "scott.marlowe"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Which database part 2