Re: A bit OT- RE: [PERFORM] Re-ordering .CONF params ... questions for this list
| От | Josh Berkus |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: A bit OT- RE: [PERFORM] Re-ordering .CONF params ... questions for this list |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200306160928.07521.josh@agliodbs.com обсуждение |
| Ответ на | A bit OT- RE: [PERFORM] Re-ordering .CONF params ... questions for this list ("Nick Fankhauser" <nickf@ontko.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Nick, > I agree... but are we the folks that the conf file needs to be made more > intuitive for? > > If the intent is to make it easier for experienced folks like ourselves who > are working with large or unusual databases to deal with PostgreSQL, then > certainly the resource usage and tuning settings should go to the top. > We'll set the other params once & never touch them again. > > On the other hand, I suspect that the majority of postgresql users play > with the other params a bit during install to get their systems working and > never touch the resource usage or tuning params ever. (And this is as it > should be, given that the defaults are reasonable for most systems.) This is a good argument. Though if you pursue it, surely you're advocating a GUI tool for PostgreSQL.conf, not that that's a bad idea ... How do other people feel about this? What options in PostgreSQL.conf do you tweak most frequently? -- Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: