Sean,
> PostgreSQL, on the other hand, has been a rock. The _only_ time I've
> had a problem with PostgreSQL is when I had a few errant applications
> leaving transactions open causing queries to build up until it reaches
> its max connection limit. I can't emphasize the stableness of
> PostgreSQL compared to MySQL: the difference is non-trivial and the
> difference is much greater than 0.5% difference in uptime.
*sigh* One of my clients did extensive reliability testing for PostgreSQL.
The results were really, really encouraging ... but I can't report them due
to an airtight NDA.
> > How about a sum up:
> > PostgreSQL is the DBA's database.
> > MySQL is the web designer's database.
>
> I wouldn't be so kind as to describe MySQL that way. I'd sum it up as
> closer to MySQL users are willing to buy into the hype (MySQL spends a
> lot of effort in hyping/promoting their DB, PostgreSQL doesn't) and
> don't do their due diligence to investigate other DB's.
I've personally found MySQL to be idea for one type of client: the type that
doesn't have a DBA or skilled tech and doesn't intend to hire one. MySQL is
good for a certain amount of idiot-proofing in that regard. Of course, I
also recommend Filemaker for the same clients, so that's grounds for
comparison.
--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco