Re: LAST_INSERT_ID equivalent
| От | Bruno Wolff III |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: LAST_INSERT_ID equivalent |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20030612182315.GA4978@wolff.to обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: LAST_INSERT_ID equivalent (Erik Price <eprice@ptc.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: LAST_INSERT_ID equivalent
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 13:44:16 -0400,
Erik Price <eprice@ptc.com> wrote:
>
>
> Edmund Dengler wrote:
> >Greetings all!
> >
> >I believe
> > select currval('sequence_name');
> >should satisfy your needs. Within a transaction it will stay the same.
>
> Ed, thanks, this looks like what I was looking for --
>
> however, I am concerned by your disclaimer. Can you explain that a
> little bit? I read it to mean "if you try to use this technique within
> a transaction where you are INSERTing a new record, it will not reflect
> the new record's ID". So then in order to determine the new record's ID
> I would need to use
>
> SELECT CURRVAL('sequence_name') + 1;
>
> within the transaction.
No. You just want to use currval. The comment was referring to other
transactions calling nextval while the transaction of interest is
proceeding.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: