Re: Question about serial vs. int datatypes
| От | Rory Campbell-Lange | 
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Question about serial vs. int datatypes | 
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20030608130343.A2914@host0406.cammail.net обсуждение исходный текст | 
| Ответ на | Question about serial vs. int datatypes (Lynna Landstreet <lynna@gallery44.org>) | 
| Список | pgsql-general | 
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 04:05:53PM -0400, Lynna Landstreet wrote: > But... when converting an existing database that already has several hundred > records in it, I can't make that field serial in PostgreSQL, can I? Because > I don't want the existing records renumbered - that would break the links > between the different tables. But if I make the id number just a smallint > field, then I'm stuck incrementing it manually after the conversion. Is > there any way around this? Any way to import the existing records with their > id number intact, and then have it switch to serial after that for new > records? Make a new table with a serial type field and then do a \d on that table. You will see that the default value for the fieldis the next value from the relevant (autocreated) sequence. If you specify a value for the "SERIAL" type field, thefield will be filled with that rather than a value from the sequence. Note that if you do this you need to reset the value of the current sequence. Use something like setval(sequencename) tomax(your_serial_field). Rory
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: