Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Sean Chittenden writes:
>
> > Keep krb4 in the tree for 7.4, but before 7.4 gets released, the
> > documentation and release notes need to state that krb4 has been
> > depreciated and that it will be removed before 7.5. I'll add submit a
> > patch for the updated verbiage in a bit. -sc
>
> I object to treating foreign software packages like that. Those who are
> interested in Kerberos 4 or even managed to obtain software for it are
> intelligent enough to be able to make judgements about it. Kerberos 4 is
> nowhere near the likely-to-be-chosen path in PostgreSQL, so there's
> nothing we need to be scared about.
True, but it does bloat our distribution. I had to work around its
need for gethostname() while I was coding the Win32 port, so it doesn't
stay around with zero maintance.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073