On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 05:19:33PM -0300, Fernando Papa wrote:
> 1) Do you have any experience/problems with this filesystem?
No.
> 2) performance could be better than "plain" UFS?
Not really, and it may be slower.
> 3) We have 4 physical 18GB Disk. We are thinking about the layout: One
> physiscal disk for O.S. and the other disk for Database. And the two
> other disks will be mirror (with DiskSuite). This could be good for
> start?
One for OS, "one for Database" as in the binary? Put the binary on
the OS's disk. Put WAL on its own disk (or at least, on a different
disk than the data storage areas). The performance is much better
that way.
> I know, solaris is not the best platform to run postgresql, but I'ts the
> only we have now.
Some people report that Linux is actually faster than Solaris on the
various SPARCs. I have my doubts, but I haven't tried.
A
--
----
Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew@libertyrms.info> M2P 2A8
+1 416 646 3304 x110