postgres on a beowulf? (AMD)opteron?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От george young
Тема postgres on a beowulf? (AMD)opteron?
Дата
Msg-id 20030519132832.6733dd56.gry@ll.mit.edu
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: postgres on a beowulf? (AMD)opteron?  (Hannu Krosing <hannu@tm.ee>)
Re: postgres on a beowulf? (AMD)opteron?  (Andrew Sullivan <andrew@libertyrms.info>)
Re: postgres on a beowulf? (AMD)opteron?  ("scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>)
Re: postgres on a beowulf? (AMD)opteron?  (Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in>)
Список pgsql-performance
Has anyone run postgres on a beowulf system?

I'm shopping for a new server.  One candidate would be a
quad opteron (64-bit AMD "hammer") machine.  Another approach might
be a beowulf of single or dual opterons.  I imagine the beowulf
would be a bit cheaper, and much more expandable, but what about
the shared memory used by the postgres backends?  I gather that
postgres uses shared memory to coordinate (locks?) between backends?

I have a smallish DB (pgdump|bzip2 -> 10MB), with ~45 users logged in
using local X(python/gtk) postgres client apps.

Will the much slower shared memory access between beowulf nodes be
a performance bottleneck?

[Next question is: has anyone used postgres on an opteron at all??]

-- George
--
 I cannot think why the whole bed of the ocean is
 not one solid mass of oysters, so prolific they seem. Ah,
 I am wandering! Strange how the brain controls the brain!
    -- Sherlock Holmes in "The Dying Detective"

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Stephan Szabo
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [ADMIN] nested query too expensive
Следующее
От: Hannu Krosing
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: postgres on a beowulf? (AMD)opteron?