Re: Buffer Cache question....

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Andrew Sullivan
Тема
Re: Buffer Cache question....
Дата
в 08:29:34
Msg-id
20030501122936.GC9725@libertyrms.info
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Buffer Cache question.... Medi Montaseri <medi.montaseri@intransa.com>
Re: Buffer Cache question.... Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: Buffer Cache question.... "scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>
Re: Buffer Cache question.... Andrew Sullivan <andrew@libertyrms.info>
On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 03:09:52PM -0600, scott.marlowe wrote:
> What about commit_siblings and commit_delay?  I haven't really played a 
> lot with those.  I would think increasing the commit delay and the number 
> of siblings should give better, but slightly bursty performance.

This depends very heavily on your actual traffic.  If you have
primarily write activity, it is a definite advantage, because you get
a boost from ganging writes to disk.  If your traffic leans more
toward reads, I find that increasing these settings is a net loss:
you just end up waiting for nothing.

BTW, it is tricky to construct a correct model load to test this,
because you have to model both the load and its distribution.

A

-- 
----
Andrew Sullivan                         204-4141 Yonge Street
Liberty RMS                           Toronto, Ontario Canada
                              M2P 2A8
                                         +1 416 646 3304 x110

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления
От: RobertD.Stewart@mail.state.ky.us
Дата:
От: Mike Mascari
Дата:
FAQ