Re: Buffer Cache question....

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andrew Sullivan
Тема Re: Buffer Cache question....
Дата
Msg-id 20030501122936.GC9725@libertyrms.info
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Buffer Cache question....  ("scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>)
Список pgsql-general
On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 03:09:52PM -0600, scott.marlowe wrote:
> What about commit_siblings and commit_delay?  I haven't really played a
> lot with those.  I would think increasing the commit delay and the number
> of siblings should give better, but slightly bursty performance.

This depends very heavily on your actual traffic.  If you have
primarily write activity, it is a definite advantage, because you get
a boost from ganging writes to disk.  If your traffic leans more
toward reads, I find that increasing these settings is a net loss:
you just end up waiting for nothing.

BTW, it is tricky to construct a correct model load to test this,
because you have to model both the load and its distribution.

A

--
----
Andrew Sullivan                         204-4141 Yonge Street
Liberty RMS                           Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew@libertyrms.info>                              M2P 2A8
                                         +1 416 646 3304 x110


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: RobertD.Stewart@mail.state.ky.us
Дата:
Сообщение: postgres connections to database
Следующее
От: Mike Mascari
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Join Stallman and Software SMEs to refuse