Re: [PERFORM] Foreign key performance

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Stephan Szabo
Тема Re: [PERFORM] Foreign key performance
Дата
Msg-id 20030418080950.R2132-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [PERFORM] Foreign key performance  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [PERFORM] Foreign key performance
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 18 Apr 2003, Tom Lane wrote:

> Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com> writes:
> > Argh. I'm getting that state where gprof returns all 0s for times.  I'm
> > pretty sure this has come up before along with how to get it to work, but
> > I couldn't find it in the archives. Someday I'll learn how to use gprof. :(
>
> You're on Linux?  You need to compile postmaster.c with -DLINUX_PROFILE.

Yep, thanks. :)

> But the call counts do sound pretty damning.

Yeah, but even with my hack last night it was still appreciably slower
than immediate constraints. Comparing the call counts in that function
for the immediate versus deferred(hacked) weren't giving me a good idea of
where that time was going.



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: default locale considered harmful? (was Re: [GENERAL]
Следующее
От: "Dave Page"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_clog woes with 7.3.2 - Episode 2