Re: DBLink cursors
От | Kevin Brown |
---|---|
Тема | Re: DBLink cursors |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20030417020342.GD1833@filer обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: DBLink cursors (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: DBLink cursors
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Joe Conway wrote: > Shridhar Daithankar wrote: > >I was just going thr. dblink code and noticed that dblink cursors are > >wrapped in their own transaction. > > yup -- been that way since 7.3 was released. > > >If an application instantiates a transaction to do 10 things, one of > >which is to fetch a cursor over dblink, how will it work? > > I guess it won't -- you're the first person who ever complained, so > quite possibly you're the first who's needed it. Won't dblink's attempt to initiate a transaction simply return with a warning if a transaction is already in progress? This is what psql does, and it's also what happens with Perl DBI, so it's only if dblink freaks out that there will be a problem. I wouldn't expect it to abort the entire (already running) transaction upon receipt of a warning... -- Kevin Brown kevin@sysexperts.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: