Re: cross-db queries (was Are we losing momentum?)
| От | Shridhar Daithankar |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: cross-db queries (was Are we losing momentum?) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200304161955.43451.shridhar_daithankar@nospam.persistent.co.in обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | cross-db queries (was Are we losing momentum?) (Rob Butler <robert.butler5@verizon.net>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wednesday 16 April 2003 19:40, Rob Butler wrote: > a) create remoteview ... (all necessary information about remote machine > and query) b) create view [local | remote] .... (necessary info) > c) create view remote-server.schema.table (necessary info) That is not a good way. Oracle does/recommends a create synonym so that either a remote view or table can be treated as if it is a loacl table/view. This takes care of select/insert/update/delete etc. I think that is a better way of integrating remote objects in current database. Of course, if there are some standards regarding remote database object, they will take precedence over oracle style of syntax. But personally I think oracle syntax is good enough. (I just check sql 92 syntax and it does have provision for remote database access) Shridhar
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: