Re: Are we losing momentum?
От | Robert E. Bruccoleri |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Are we losing momentum? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200304152254.h3FMsrwe047585@stone.congenomics.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Are we losing momentum? (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Are we losing momentum?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I beg to differ with Tom Lane's opinion, but schemas do not solve the problem with multi-database queries because of the following reasons: 1) When dealing with large databases, the use of multiple databases reduces the risk of wiping out all the data, and reduces the recovery time in case of accidents. 2) Multiple databases allow for different management policies on each database, whereas schemas require some consistency across them all. In a heterogeneous working environment, this is a signficant issue. 3) PostgreSQL should strive for heterogeneous multi-database queries, so that applications currently using other systems could be slowly migrated to PostgreSQL by moving portions of a database from other vendors to PostgreSQL. In my work, the lack of PostgreSQL - Oracle connectivity is a disabling impediment to wider PostgreSQL usage. --Bob +-----------------------------+------------------------------------+ | Robert E. Bruccoleri, Ph.D. | email: bruc@acm.org | | President, Congenomics Inc. | URL: http://www.congen.com/~bruc | | P.O. Box 314 | Phone: 609 818 7251 | | Pennington, NJ 08534 | | +-----------------------------+------------------------------------+
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: