Re: Are we losing momentum?
От | Kevin Brown |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Are we losing momentum? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20030415091042.GA1833@filer обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Are we losing momentum? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Curt Sampson <cjs@cynic.net> writes: > > That's a pretty reasonable thought. I work for a shop that sells > > Postgres support, and even we install MySQL for the Q&D ticket tracking > > system we recommend because we can't justify the cost to port it to > > postgres. If the postgres support were there, we would surely be using it. > > > How to fix such a situation, I'm not sure. "MySQL Compatability Mode," > > anyone? :-) > > What issues are creating a compatibility problem for you? Erm...reserved words? "Freeze" is a reserved word, for instance, and that actually bit me when converting an MS-SQL database... I have no problem with reserved words in principle, at least when they refer to the SQL-standard commands and their options, but it's not clear that turning options (such as FREEZE) for PG-specific commands (such as VACUUM) into reserved words is a good idea. But it may not be possible to avoid it, unfortunately. :-( -- Kevin Brown kevin@sysexperts.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: