Re: aaagh... postgres is segfaulting? -- fix
| От | Richard Huxton |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: aaagh... postgres is segfaulting? -- fix |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200304091435.13058.dev@archonet.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: aaagh... postgres is segfaulting? -- fix (Joshua Moore-Oliva <josh@chatgris.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: aaagh... postgres is segfaulting? -- fix
Re: aaagh... postgres is segfaulting? -- fix |
| Список | pgsql-general |
On Wednesday 09 Apr 2003 12:25 pm, Joshua Moore-Oliva wrote: > I needed to apply this... for some reason when I do timetamp related > queries without executing that a segfault occurs. > > UPDATE pg_proc SET prorettype = 1114 WHERE prosrc = 'timestamptz_izone'; Hmm - mine reads 1186 (interval). Two questions: 1. Did you notice what value it had before? 2. Have you made the same change in template0/1 (and what values did they have)? Actually, a third question: how did you ever figure that out? -- Richard Huxton
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: