Re: Consecutive queries
| От | Andrew Sullivan |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Consecutive queries |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20030406223952.GK26566@libertyrms.info обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Consecutive queries ("Raymond O'Donnell" <rod@iol.ie>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
On Sun, Apr 06, 2003 at 09:23:04PM +0100, Raymond O'Donnell wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Is there any way to ensure that one query has completed before a
> second one is executed? I have to execute an UPDATE and follow it
Sure; do one after another in the same transaction.
> I'm accessing PostgresSQL via ADO on a windows machine, and I tried -
>
> (i) enclosing the two queries in one transaction, as follows:
>
> begin;
> update ... (etc)... ;
> select ...(etc)...;
> commit;
If this doesn't work, then there must be something you're not telling
us, or else something _really_ strange about the ADO interface. The
UPDATE either completed or not; there'd be no way for the SELECT to
return anything different than the state of the relevant tuples.
A
--
----
Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew@libertyrms.info> M2P 2A8
+1 416 646 3304 x110
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: