Re: slow query
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: slow query |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200302231347.58960.josh@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: slow query (Ryan Bradetich <rbradetich@uswest.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: slow query
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Ryan, > > The above should use an EXISTS clause, not IN, unless you are absolutely > > sure that the subquery will never return more than 12 rows. > > I am assuming you said this because EXISTS is faster for > 12 rows? > Interesting :) That's my rule of thumb, *NOT* any kind of relational-calculus-based truth. Basically, one should only use IN for a subquery when one is *absolutely* sure that the subquery will only return a handful of records, *and* the subquery doesn't have to do an complex work like aggregating or custom function evaluation. You're safer using EXISTS for all subqueries, really. -- Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: