Re: Someone's broken psql's connection-failure error reporting
| От | Kurt Roeckx |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Someone's broken psql's connection-failure error reporting |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20030214172134.GA2857@ping.be обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Someone's broken psql's connection-failure error reporting (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 08:55:23PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> I've done a little bit of cleanup, but that code is still a mess... > >> someone should rewrite these routines. > > > Yes, I looked at it and struggled to get both IPv4 and IPv6 cleanly > > working. Any ideas on how to improve it? > > The major problem is the huge amount of #ifdefs, most of which seem to > come from the fact that we deal with a list of possible addresses in > one case and not the other. It would help a lot if we fixed things so > that we dealt with a list in either case --- only a one-element list, > if we don't have getaddrinfo, but getaddrinfo2 could hide that and > provide a uniform API regardless. I'm actually working on getting rid of all those #ifdef's, but it's going slowly. (I have very little free time.) Kurt
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: