Re: TIME vs. TIMESTAMP data type
| От | Ludwig Lim |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: TIME vs. TIMESTAMP data type |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20030206120851.54519.qmail@web80301.mail.yahoo.com обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: TIME vs. TIMESTAMP data type (Tomasz Myrta <jasiek@klaster.net>) |
| Список | pgsql-sql |
Hi Tomasz: --- Tomasz Myrta <jasiek@klaster.net> wrote: > > Probably you are right, but you can cast into > timestamp before using these functions. > Do you really need to care amount of storage? I was just thinking if both TIMESTAMP and TIME have use the same amount of space (I was think TIME might use less space since it doesn't need to store month, year, day as compared to TIMESTAMP), and TIMESTAMP have more functions and is easier to cast, I might as well use TIMESTAMP. > Don't forget about INTERVAL type, which is very > useful for time calculations. > --> I'll check that one out. __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo! http://sbc.yahoo.com
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: