Re: not using index for select min(...)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Josh Berkus
Тема Re: not using index for select min(...)
Дата
Msg-id 200301311531.12605.josh@agliodbs.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на not using index for select min(...)  (Don Bowman <don@sandvine.com>)
Ответы Re: not using index for select min(...)  (Sean Chittenden <sean@chittenden.org>)
Список pgsql-performance
Don,

> I have a table which is very large (~65K rows). I have
> a column in it which is indexed, and I wish to use for
> a join. I'm finding that I'm using a sequential scan
> for this when selecting a MIN.

Due to Postgres' system of extensible aggregates (i.e. you can write your own
aggregates), all aggregates will trigger a Seq Scan in a query.   It's a
known drawrback that nobody has yet found a good way around.

--
-Josh Berkus
 Aglio Database Solutions
 San Francisco


В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Don Bowman
Дата:
Сообщение: not using index for select min(...)
Следующее
От: Andrew Sullivan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: not using index for select min(...)