Re: IPv6 patch

That is _exactly_ how it has to be done.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Neil Conway wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-01-27 at 20:19, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I had someone on the IPv6 IRC channel interested, but haven't seen any
> > patch yet.  It isn't that hard to do.
> 
> If we cleanly split the Postgres-specific code from the stuff that's
> been imported from BIND, shouldn't it be easy to import new versions,
> and thus get IPv6 support for free?
> 
> Or at least, that's what I vaguely recall Paul Vixie saying on
> pgsql-patches a while ago:
> 
>
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&threadm=200202221828.g1MISX102055%40candle.pha.pa.us&rnum=2&prev=/groups%3Fq%3Dpaul%2Bvixie%2Bgroup:comp.databases.postgresql.patches%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26selm%3D200202221828.g1MISX102055%2540candle.pha.pa.us%26rnum%3D2
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Neil
> -- 
> Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
> 
> 
> 
> 

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073