Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > However, the server log messages stating an IPv6 socket was not made is
> > only printed if the binary supports IPv6. The message seems to be a
> > compromise between those who wanted a separate IPv6 GUC/flag and those
> > who wanted it to silently fail on IPv6.
>
> I'm not sure. Those who wanted silence don't get any silence and those
> who wanted a configurable hard failure get neither the configurability nor
> any failure.
That is the compromise. Neither gets what they want, but the final
solution is closer to each. This is probably the best we can do.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073