Re: Can we revisit the thought of PostgreSQL 7.2.4?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: Can we revisit the thought of PostgreSQL 7.2.4?
Дата
Msg-id 200301260527.h0Q5RiU22818@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Can we revisit the thought of PostgreSQL 7.2.4?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Can we revisit the thought of PostgreSQL 7.2.4?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Agreed.  How do we get the patches in there, or are they there already?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > So, do we have non-security fixes to warrant a 7.2.X?
> 
> There's the order-of-operations-in-checkpoint problem, and there's
> one variant of the "no one parent tuple was found" problem that
> should have been patched in 7.2.3, but was overlooked.
> 
> Also, the bogus-datetime-table-ordering bugs appear to exist in
> 7.2 (cf. recent complaint about timezone ART not being recognized).
> That ought to be back-patched, if we're going to make a 7.2.4,
> though one could certainly say that that doesn't merit a release
> by itself.
> 
> I think there's enough to warrant a 7.2.4 ...
> 
>             regards, tom lane
> 

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Can we revisit the thought of PostgreSQL 7.2.4?
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PERFORM] Proposal: relaxing link between explicit JOINs and execution order