Re: Mount options for Ext3?
| От | Josh Berkus |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Mount options for Ext3? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200301241822.33731.josh@agliodbs.com обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Mount options for Ext3? (Kevin Brown <kevin@sysexperts.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Mount options for Ext3?
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
Kevin,
> So if I'm right about that, then you might consider using the
> "data=writeback" option for the filesystem that contains the actual
> data (usually /usr/local/pgsql/data), but I'd use the default
> ("data=ordered") at the very least (I suppose there's no harm in using
> "data=journal" if you're willing to put up with the performance hit,
> but it's not clear to me what benefit, if any, there is) for
> everything else.
Well, the only reason I use Ext3 rather than Ext2 is to prevent fsck's on
restart after a crash. So I'm interested in the data option that gives the
minimum performance hit, even if it means that I sacrifice some reliability.
I'm running with fsynch on, and the DB is on a mirrored drive array, so I'm
not too worried about filesystem-level errors.
So would that be "data=writeback"?
--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: